Sight
Where does AI influence material decisions, workflows and outcomes? What can leadership actually see?
Service / AI Governance
Boards do not need to become technologists. They do need confidence about where AI is used, who is accountable, whether controls are effective and when issues should be escalated.
The SAGE framework
Developed by Dr Abbie Widin for directors, SAGE provides four questions through which boards and executive teams can examine both internal and third-party AI systems.
Where does AI influence material decisions, workflows and outcomes? What can leadership actually see?
Who owns the performance, vendor risks, assurance and response when AI systems fail or change?
Are legal, ethical and strategic boundaries clear, tested and supported by effective controls?
Which anomalies, failures and unresolved risks must reach senior management or the board—and when?
SAGE: Sight · Accountability · Guardrails · Escalation. Framework by Dr Abbie Widin.
How we can help
Support can be tailored to the board, management team or organisation's current governance maturity.
Make AI's opportunities, material exposures and director responsibilities intelligible, relevant and discussable.
Assess visibility of AI use, ownership, oversight structures, third-party exposure and escalation readiness.
Shape risk-proportionate policies, decision rights, reporting expectations and oversight responsibilities.
Prioritise actions to embed governance in existing committees, risk processes, training and management reporting.
A board-level view
The right response is neither blanket enthusiasm nor blanket restriction. It is informed oversight, proportionate to the organisation's strategy, exposure and capacity.
Our approach draws on commercial leadership, technology development and lived boardroom experience, rather than treating AI governance as a standalone technical checklist.
AI governance advisory
Discuss a board briefing, a SAGE-led governance review or a practical next-step roadmap.